Ph 70c. Oral  and Written Communication

Spring, 2008     

Instructor: Prof. David Hitlin (http://hep.caltech.edu/~hitlin/ )
Teaching Assistant: Darin Ragozzine (http://www.gps.caltech.edu/people/darin/profile
)


The class will have an organizational meeting in 469 Lauritsen from 2:00 to 4:00pm, Tuesday, April 1

The first meeting, held on Tuesday, April 1 will be primarily for informational and organizational purposes.  We will discuss the question of whether we can find a more convenient time for the class, as historically the nominal time conflicts with certain other courses.

Catalog description: Provides practice and guidance in oral and written communication of material related to contemporary physics research. Students will choose a topic of interest, make presentations of this material in a variety of formats and, through a guided process, draft and revise a technical or review article on the topic.  Ph70 is intended primarily for senior physics majors; enrollment will be limited.  Completion of this course satisfies the Institute Core Communication Requirement.

This course is part of the Institute Core Communication Requirement.
The six unit requirement is to be met in the Junior or Senior years.
The Oral Presentation portion of Ph 70 will be graded by the class as a whole (see below).

Ph 70 is organized as a seminar. After some introductory discussion, each student will settle on a theme with a specific topic or topics of physical interest. Students will make oral presentations and write a paper, in an ongoing dialog with the instructor and TA.


Presentations:

Each student will make two presentations.

 *

 A 30 minute physics seminar on a subject of contemporary interest, aimed at a professional audience (your peers)

 *

 A 30 minute popular presentation aimed at an educated but non-technical audience

As a courtesy to the rest of the class, if you drop this course or are unable to appear for a particular presentation, making it necessary to alter the order of presentations, please inform the instructor, so that others are not inconvenienced.

  DATE

 NAME  (click for video)


 PRESENTATION TITLE (click for presentation)

TIME
(min)

Tuesday
April 1
  Organizational Meeting

Tuesday
April 8

  Thomas Mainiero
  Matthew Krogstad
  David Romero
 Quantum Chaos
 Spin Injection and Detection
 Flux Pinning in Superconductivity
30
30
30
Tuesday
April 15
  Prashant Saraswat
  David Rocklin
  Edward Perepelitsky
 Baryogenesis through Leptogenesis
 Investigations of “Mesa” Beams for LIGO
 Quantum Computation
30
30
30

Tuesday
April 22

  Christopher Moody
  Andrew Lee
  Justin Lazear
  Ashok Kumar
 Quantum Fourier Transform
 Tests of the Gravitational Inverse Square Law Below the Dark Energy Length Scale
 SPIDER Cold Load
 Searches for Dark Matter: Conflicting Results from the DAMA and CDMS Experiments
30
30
30
30

Tuesday
April 29

  Kun Woo Kim M1 M2
  Lauren Porter
  Brian Zhou
  Matthew Chan
 Exploration of New Pathways to Ion Extraction from Liquid Droplets
  Quantum Error Correction
  Prototyping Magnetic Coils for the Neutron EDM Experiment
  CP Violation and the BABAR Experiment
30
30
30
30

Tuesday
May 6

  Thomas Mainiero
  Matthew Krogstad
  David Romero
  Prashant Saraswat
 Symplectic Geometry in Classical and Quantum Mechanics
 Moore's Law and the Future of Computing
 Superconductors as Photon Detectors
 Extra Dimensions
30
30
30
30

Tuesday
May 13

  David Rocklin
  William Raburn
  Edward Perepelitsky
  Christopher Moody
 Gravitational Waves: Ripples in Spacetime
 Can Gravity Be Approximated as Newtonian in Galaxies?
 Cosmology (Chalk Talk)
 Kuiper Belt & Kuiper Belt Objects
30
30
30
30

Tuesday
May 20

  Andrew Lee
  Justin Lazear
  Ashok Kumar
  Kun Woo Kim
 Plasma Physics
 The CMB and Bolometers
 Time's Arrow (Chalk Talk)
 Direct Water-Splitting and Hydrogen Industry
30
30
30
30

Tuesday
May 27

  Lauren Porter
  Brian Zhou
  Matthew Chan
  William Raburn
 Topic 2
 Topic 2
 Topic 2
 Topic 2
30
30
30
30

Paper:

The written portion of the course will consist of the writing of, over the course of the term, an article on a technical topic in a style appropriate for Scientific American.  The idea is to communicate an interesting physics topic to a literate, but non-technical, reader. The subject may be the same one on which your popular oral presentation is based. A proper set of references should be included.

The writing of this paper will proceed through a series of stages: proposal, outline, draft and revision, in order to provide an environment in which you can receive (we hope) helpful feedback.

The schedule is as follows:

Proposal (April 15): A one page statement of what you plan to write and how you plan to approach the project with a few references listed.
Outline (April 29): An outline in sufficient detail to convince us that you have a clear idea of how to organize the work, together with a list of references you intend to use.
Draft (May 13): A complete version of the paper. This will be read in detail and we will provide suggestions that you may incorporate to improve the paper.  Students will read and comment on other students' paper drafts.
Final Version:  (May 27)

The medium of exchange for papers will be Adobe .pdf or Microsoft Word .doc files. Send these to me by email. Do not hand the paper in on paper.


Grades

The oral presentation portion of the course will be graded by the class as a whole. A rating sheet will be handed out to the class for each presentation. The class will briefly discuss and then rate the presentation, with ratings (which will be anonymous) on a scale of 1 through 10.  To receive a passing grade in the class, you must not only make all of your required presentations, but you must hand in ratings for the presentations in at least seven of the nine class meetings (after the Organization Meeting).

Oral presentations will be recorded on video and made available to the presenter as streaming video. Presenters will be asked to view the video of their lecture and grade themselves in the same manner as the audience.


Here is a sample grading sheet:

Presenter: 

Title:

Type of presentation:

Date:

Rater:

 

Lowest  --------------- RATING -----------------Highest

 Talk Attribute

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Appropriateness of Level

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest of material

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Organization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Use of allotted time

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Slide organization/clarity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Clarity of exposition

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Speaking style

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Overall presentation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Glossary

Appropriateness of Level

Was the presentation pitched at a level that would make it interesting and intelligible to the attended audience?

Interest of material

Was the chosen topic and illustrative material interesting to you and would it be interesting enough to hold the attention of the intended audience?

Organization

Was the presentation well organized? Did it have a clear introduction, motivation, exposition and conclusion?

Use of allotted time

Was the allocation of time to each of the above areas appropriate? Did the speaker fill/keep to his/her allotted time?

Slide organization/clarity

Were the slides well organized? Were they readable? Did they illustrate the points intended?

Clarity of exposition

Was the presentation as a whole well-organized? Were points made clearly and in such a way as to lead you through the topic in such a way as to convey the intended information?

Speaking style

Was the speaker clear? Did he/she speak with adequate volume, making eye contact with the audience. Was the style appropriate to the type of presentation?

Overall presentation

How would you summarize your overall impression of the presentation?




Paraphernalia

Most presentations in physics are made using either a laptop computer with an LCD projector or, less often, transparencies with an overhead projector. Both an LCD projector overhead and a transparency projector will be available for the class. You can either provide your own laptop, send the presentation to me as an email enclosure, or post the file in a network-accessible place. If you want to use my laptop, be aware that it has a network connection, a USB 2.0 port, and a CD-ROM. I encourage you to send me the presentation by email (or provide a URL) before the class meeting time, in order to allow efficient use of class time. It is a good idea to embed fonts in either pdf or ppt files, to minimize mishaps.


References

While most of what you need to know to make an effective presentation is common sense, there are techniques you can learn to improve the quality of your presentations. You may wish to refer to some reading material for general orientation, or for some particular pointers. Here are references to some books and web sites that you may find useful:

Books

1) Sinclair Goodland, Speaking Technically, London, Imperial College Press, 1996.
2) Peter Kenny, A Handbook of Public Speaking for Scientists and Engineers, Bristol, Adam Hilger, Ltd., 1982.
3) Dan O'Hair, Rob Stewart and Hannah Rubenstein, A Speaker's Guidebook, New York, Bedford/St. Martin's, 2001.

Web Sites on Oral Presentation:

http://www.onr.navy.mil/about/speaking%5Ftips/default.asp

http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~markhill/conference-talk.html

http://www.canberra.edu.au/studyskills/learning/oralpres.html

Web Sites on Scientific Writing:

http://people.eku.edu/ritchisong/801lecnotes.htm

http://www.io.com/~hcexres/textbook/

http://www.languages.ait.ac.th/el21open.htm

http://www.writing.eng.vt.edu/exercises/

The Hixon Writing Center is an important resource. Dr. Steven Youra is the Director (X3706, syoura@hss.caltech.edu).


How to get in touch with us

David Hitlin

I am typically on campus on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday and at Stanford Linear Accelerator on Thursday and Friday, although there are sometimes changes to this schedule.

I will not keep formal office hours; feel free to come by or call at any time.
Email will often be the most convenient method of communication.

At Caltech:
Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday

At Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC): Thursday and Friday

 

 

Office: 367 Lauritsen

Office: 205 Research Office Building (Bldg. 48)

Mail Stop: 356-48

Mail Stop: 35

Telephone: (626) 395 6694

Telephone: (650) 926 2871

Fax: (626) 584 9304

Fax: (650) 926 3882

email: hitlin@hep.caltech.edu

 

Secretary: Betty Smith

Secretary: Kathy Webb

Telephone: (626) 395 6667

Telephone: (650) 926 2363

email: betty@hep.caltech.edu

 

 

TA: Darin Ragozzine
Office: 154 S. Mudd
Email:  darin
@its.caltech.edu
Phone:  (626) 395-6960
Mobile: (626) 644 0248

Office Hour: Monday 2-3

      Page last updated on May 21,  2008